






























|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Congratulations again on holding the sedan record at the Nurburgring! While unofficial, I have no doubts as to the validity of this accomplishment. It couldn’t go to a more deserving company, as I’m sure the development of this entirely new platform took a tremendous amount of research to achieve.
I am impressed but not overall surprised at the well-roundedness of the new Porsche sedan. All reviews have praised it as comfortable, luxurious and sporty, if not a little odd to look at, like the sedan only Porsche could build.
But primarily, it is the design philosophy that I have come to appreciate; a design philosophy that is revolutionizing the way track performance in a street car is viewed.
To dissect what I love about the Panamera is to describe why it is such a great performer whilst maintaining everyday drivability: a sturdy chassis, a rear-biased AWD system, and a front-mid-engine layout. Notice, I’m not focusing on power, because power is fickle. Just like taxable income, it’s nice to have more of it even though you’re not likely to be able to use all of it when you want to.
Surely there are lighter sedans on the market, not to mention more powerful sedans. There are even lighter and more powerful sedans. And yet… there are not faster sedans. Truly a great accomplishment by the engineers working on this project.
Porsche has really moved the performance benchmark for sedans. Because even if their current competitors decide to tip the power-to-weight balance even further in their own favor with some extra added boost, the Panamera platform is a faster chassis. Meaning that a quid-pro-quo horsepower war with the Panamera is a losing game to any of its rear-wheel-drive competitors. The Panamera uses more of its power on a track, therefore the game of one-upmanship will play out in the Panamera’s favor until the competition updates their chassis to mimic the power-to-the-ground capabilities the Panamera exudes.
If you had strict rules of power and weight in street stock configuration, allowing any optional equipment (including AWD and a Doppelkuplung if you wish) so long as power and weight are standardized, the Panamera would be the current favorite. To translate, if you set a horsepower restriction on two fast sedans to 500 at the peak, it is already no contest. Meaning there are no 500hp sedans that can beat the Panamera. Set it to 550… again, no contest. There are no 550hp cars that can beat the Panamera. In fact it takes over 550 horsepower (and a lower curb weight) for the Panamera’s nearest title threat to match the 507 horsepower Panamera on this epic racecourse.
That is what I mean by a fast chassis. A high power-to-the-ground ratio.
And if you have a prize racehorse, you don’t take it for granted. No, once you realize you’ve got a king of champions in your stable, you selectively breed it. The Panamera would make a fine sire to a wide range of champion four-hoofers. But where to start?
Well a gap analysis of Porsche shows that they have no true grand touring coupe. They have a few half sports cars half GT cars, but how about a 928 successor?
Think about it: all the goods are there for a totally wild 2+2. Heck, I even think a Panamera coupe would be the best looking horse in the Porsche stable if that oddly-stretched middle section were tapered back by a few decimeters.
And then there’s the performance! The sky is the limit for a car that out-performs others in its ‘class.’ They scramble to shave tenths while you find out there were more seconds left in her.
I’m betting a 480hp Porsche 928 built on the Panamera chassis would make short work of a whole range of more powerful competitors. Even at almost two tons, it would already be built on a chassis that outruns cars with 15% higher power-to-weight, by several seconds! That’s an advantage I’d want to get behind.
Alcon completes deal confirming SpeedForSale.com will be the exclusive North American distributor for Alcon’s GT-R Brake SuperKit. July 27, 2009 – Alcon Components LTD, a world-wide leader in high performance braking systems and technology, has confirmed that SpeedForSale.com will be the exclusive North American distributor of their Nissan GT-R Brake SuperKits & OEM Lightweight Rotor Upgrades. SpeedForSale has a stocking order of GT-R SuperKits on the way, which should be in stock and ready to ship around the end of August. SpeedForSale will also appoint a few select dealers of this product in the USA in the near future. The GT-R SuperKit has the largest brake caliper, rotor, and pad upgrade available for the GT-R, with the front rotors having a massive 15.75” x 1.42” (400mm x 36mm) size, and the rear rotors coming in at 15.16” x 1.30” (385mm x 33mm.) The kit’s 2-piece floating rotors also include Alcon’s unique bobbin drive system and crescent groove pattern on the face along with 48 internal vanes with turbulators. The mammoth sized ‘Mono-block’ calipers are machined from solid billet and contain 6-pistons in both the front AND rear, along with dust seals, anti-rattle clips, ventilated piston inserts in the front, and utilization of the OEM parking brake in the rear. The brake pads included are Pagid RS9-2 models, with anti-squeal shims and a surface area of 33.6” square inches (217 square centimeters) in the front and 18.7” (121 sq cm) in the rear. High quality Goodridge stainless steel braided brake lines complete the kit. And, best of all, these huge brakes fit inside the OEM 20” wheels and work with the stock brake actuation system! Pricing on the Alcon SuperKit will be $12,990, which will include your choice of Castrol SRF brake fluid or Motul RBF brake fluid. More detailed information about the Alcon GT-R SuperKit can be found here: https://www.speedforsale.com/nissangtrparts/alcon-alcon-brake-superkit-limited-time-price-p-1033.html?osCsid=1ne2dkeame584klv923uedtg51 Alcon also offers an OEM replacement lightweight rotor, which utilizes Alcon’s unique bobbin drive system on 2-piece floating rotors with crescent grooves. Unlike some other brands that only supply the actual rotor face and require that you re-use the stock hat, which can warp over time and cause balancing issues and brake pedal pulsation, the Alcon rotor upgrades come fully assembled with new Alcon hats and are ready to install with no assembly required. Pricing on a set of 4 of these will be $3500, with the first 3 sets ordered having a special price of $3000 ($3500 normal price.) The Alcon GT-R OEM brake rotor upgrade can be purchased here: https://www.speedforsale.com/nissangtrparts/alcon-alcon-lightweight-brake-rotor-upgrade-p-1052.html?osCsid=3hhamf9lst1b4mhjfnu771dn43 Alcon headquarters is located in the United Kingdom. Their products are known and used world-wide due to their high quality and innovative design. Alcon is a supplier for many manufacturers and racing organizations such as IRL IndyCar Series, NASCAR, Daytona Prototypes, Australian V8 Super Car Series, Grand Am, WRC, Trophy Truck Series, Bentley, Brabus, Citreon Sport, Jaguar, Land Rover, Raybestos, Audi Sport, and more. For more information, please contact Jeremy or Chinchi at www.SpeedForSale.com via email (Sales@SpeedForSale.com) or telephone (770-777-4774.) Photos are courtesy of Maximusracing. These images are of the South Side Performance GT-R in Dallas for the Gumball 3000! I dont want to say much but its one of the fastest cars out there including the highest rated GT-R on the market! its taken out 700+hp porsches and kept up with the veyron’s, easily! 850hp and more updates to come after the gumball event. Notice the press release below Stating that there will be 5 Transmission packages and more power, not to mention more durability testing! Im not sure it could get better? Edit: Added a video via Paul from the UK. he was over in dallas to see David Yu, but just missed them. Here is what paul had to say…
Thanks Paul!!!!!!
A look at extrapolations of the 2009 Nissan GT-R’s ‘best lap’ performance versus some of its frequent comparisons.
Using the same statistical techniques used in our earlier post, Calculating Track Times, we can take ‘best lap’ data for any number of cars and courses and predict the average distance in seconds each car will be from one-another per minute of time spent on any shared track.
Since we’re mostly concerned with the controversy surrounding Nissan’s R35 GT-R, we’ll focus on coparing it to 7 of its regular magazine competitors. And since everyone’s favorite ‘best time’ to quote is the Nurburgring, we’ll use that as our intended projection.
Keep in mind: all of the test data so far is of the Series I R35 GT-R, known in the US as the 2009 model-year. To my knowledge, all tests were done on the base-model’s Bridgestone rubber.
ACR versus GT-R comparison:
Z06 versus GT-R comparison:
997 GT2 versus GT-R comparison:
ZR1 versus GT-R comparison:
997 GT3 versus GT-R comparison:
997 GT3 RS versus GT-R comparison:
Summary of Nurburgring projections: GT-R versus: ACR: 7:34 Z06: 7:32 GT2: 7:32 ZR1: 7:34 GT3: 7:32 RS: 7:34
Even against the ZR1, in which the GT-R had met this benchmark only twice in timed testing outside of the ‘Ring, the formula holds true. Showing that the drivers really did do their best with both cars on both days. 1.1 seconds per minute on the track is all the penalty you need pay to have 2 extra seats.
Projecting these onto the Nurburgring, once again shows how capable the GT-R in stock configuration ought to be. With the right driver and conditions, a base 2009 GT-R should be putting down a low-7:30’s time on the Nordschleife. Models fitted with optional Dunlop tires may be even faster. Showing relative position of some common supercars in terms of ‘best lap’ accomplishments at popular road courses. Here’s the data (so far). This can be an evolving post as we get more ZR1 times, etc. *Note, without the time scale, all it is showing is relative position. Distance between points per-line is equivalent to time that passes between cars completing their ‘best laps.’ i.e. seconds are not accounted for, but the positions are accurate. I’ll catch up with this section ASAP. I just came across a mountain of data ^ Here’s how it looks benchmarked against the Corvette Z06: Z06 versus: Viper ACR: 0/6 Nissan GT-R: 0/9 997 GT3 RS: 1/4 997 GT3: 4/7 997 GT2: 1/4 997 Turbo: 4/7 Heres how it looks benchmarked against the Nissan GT-R: GT-R versus: Viper ACR: 0/6 997 GT2: 4/5 (that’ll change, the GT-R has been up against the GT2 on closer to 9 tracks. They end up being very close) 997 Turbo: 5/5 997 GT3: 6/7 997 GT3 RS: 3/4 Corvette Z06: 9/9 Here’s how it looks benchmarked against the 911 Turbo (more data points to come). 997 Turbo versus: Viper ACR: 0/4 Nissan GT-R: 0/7 Corvette Z06: 3/7 997 GT3: 1/5 997 GT3 RS: 3/4 997 GT2: 0/3 We’re just getting warmed up. Stay tuned for updates! *Note, I’m not working quite as hard to reference each individual time as I was for my previous post, Calculating Track Times. But each should have been quoted by a semi-legitimate source for consideration. An effective way to predict a lap time on any high-speed road course by measuring against others.
~ by Norm McAverage
There are some out there that act confused that some people find Nissan’s R35 GT-R manufacturer laps believable. So to answer the begged question; Why is that exactly?
Well what you certainly wouldn’t want to do is take one car specification, like power-to-weight-ratio, and blow it out of proportion. That might work in drag-racing, but not for any type of track where one must consider grip, weight distribution, center of gravity, or aerodynamic properties to improve lap times.
No, a more scientific way to do it would be to extrapolate based on how well a set of cars performs elsewhere during timed laps. Let’s verify by crunching some numbers.
If we are going to benchmark the GT-R here, it would be nice if we had a control car; something that always performs well against the Nissan. Viper fans will have one more reason to smile, because today we’re going to use the ACR as the standard to which all others are judged. It has been timed at more tracks than the Corvette ZR1 and performs better than all the other entrants.
We end up with a statistically relevant set of data:
We can graph these one-dimensionally to show the difference in seconds each car came in relative to one-another. As best as run-of-the-mill graphing software can promise, it’s all to-scale – time difference in time is denoted by distance on the graph. If you’ve noticed that the hash marks are not equal, that is true. They are not intended to be. We’re interested in relative position. So the gap between the first and the last time will be set equal on each graph.
This is very telling actually. You should see a pattern developing here. If not, maybe a little further analysis is necessary. How about extrapolation? Since tracks have different lengths, we can find out how many seconds each car is falling behind the ACR for every minute of timed racing.
What this means is, for every minute spent on the track with a Viper ACR, the Nissan GT-R on average falls 1.6 seconds further behind; the 911 Turbo, 4.2 sec… the Z06, 2.7 seconds; etc.
Now, if we wanted to project how far behind the ACR each car will be on the Nurburgring, we can take the seconds they fall behind per minute, and multiply by the number of minutes the ACR took to lap the ‘Ring.
The math actually works very well. We can project how fast each car would go around the Nurburgring, whilst totally ignoring their actual reported ‘Ring times, and then compare.
Basically there is solid evidence here that the calculation works – despite having a maximum of five data points. The prediction for the GT-R was 4 seconds ahead of the first manufacturer claimed time, and 5 seconds behind the second claimed time, i.e. dead-center; the GT2’s projected time was 4 seconds off of Porsche’s best claimed time; and for the clincher, the Z06 time was spot-on.
For those that need it explained, most of these cars perform very similarly relative to the ACR on other tracks as they do on the Nurburgring.
And though this should not be looked at as a GT-R versus 911 only analysis, it is clear that the GT-R consistently posts better ‘best laps’ than the Porsche 997 Turbo.
Though there is some controversy left to be had. Based on the Turbo’s performance on tracks where it has been tested against the Viper, there is no way it should be putting down a Nurburgring time close to what Porsche reports. It is just so much slower than the Viper ACR everywhere else, that 7:38 doesn’t make mathematical sense.
Of course that does not prove that, with the right driver, the Porsche could not go 15 seconds faster on the Nurburgring. Without any evidence, we are in no situation to determine that Porsche lacks a driver to make up the difference. It would be foolish to debate that ‘Ring times are 100% repeatable with all the various factors to consider.
‘Worst times’ have no statistical relevance in a comparison of ‘best times.’ A car can always be driven slower than the best time if the driver and conditions are not ideal. It may also be true that any of the cars above could achieve a better ‘best time’ if driven harder. But we are not guessing, adding a correcting factor, or manipulating for the purpose of skewing the results in any way. Those are the actual reported times here, and they are all being treated equally, at face value.
Some things to keep in mind about these times may be that while the Toshio Suzuki timed lap was on the Dunlop tires mounted to the Premium GT-R’s knurled rims, most press cars were shod with the base-model’s Bridgestone footwear. Technically, that ought to make an even stronger case for the GT-R to be able to stay within somewhat distant visual range of the Viper ACR – but still out in front of the others – on any track.
Another thing to note is that these times are all different press cars with different drivers. It’s not like it’s a single ‘ringer’ snatching up respectable times for any company. Though the GT-R is the most readily criticized for using a ‘Ring ringer, its very similar competitive prowess on other tracks does not support this conspiracy theory.
It is also clear that neither power-to-weight nor traction has been an issue for the GT-R on other paved surfaces. The GT-R posts a phenomenal time in stock configuration, repeatedly.
While it’s not proof, it does yield a rough equivalency formula:
Viper ACR > Nissan GT-R ~ Porsche GT2 > Corvette Z06 ~ 911 Turbo ~ GT3
This mental calculation has been going on in many of the GT-R acceptors’ heads for some time, brought into focus in pretty colors – if not just to annoy a few more skeptics. It makes a strong case for the ‘anywhere, anytime’ capabilities of the R35 Nissan.
While it may not be the fastest sports car in the world; if you measure what a car can do by what it has already done – statistically speaking – Nissan’s manufacturer’s claim is not farfetched. South Side Performance the compainy with the first upgraded Turbo R35 and one of the highest horse power R35’s available has just released new Clutchs and transmission cooler for the R35 GT-R. The increasing demand for such high horse power cars and track dedicated drivers are looking for transmission solutions to combat clutch life and heat, not to mention more power.
SSP offer are currently offering clutchs for preorder now. They offer two kits, one for warn out or broken stock clutchs and the other for High power applications up to 700hp. These Have been in development since before october of last year, along with some other good treats well seen soon.
The best part of this modification is that it is a relatively easy installation that can be done at nearly any transmission shop. As a result, this is one of the simplest and most effective modifications a GTR owner can do to strengthen their transmission as a whole.
The next thing drivers are looking for is cooling. The average R35 is great but for the track it cannot take a constaint beating without proper upgrade for cooling. SSP now offer an upgraded Transmission cooler for much cooler temps for tracking the R35 GT-R. Not to mention high power applications that require addition cooling to the transmission.
This system includes: a 2 1/2 inches deep sump made out of a single block of 6160 Billet Aluminum and is finned to allow for as much cooling as possible, a bar and plate cooler with two heavy duty fans that sits in the rear valance between the exhaust tips, and a high volume pump that runs the entire set up by way of steel braided -8 lines with zero pressure drop. This all adds up to a system that contains 4 quarts more fluid and runs significantly cooler than stock, even when pushed to the max in a racing environment.
During extensive testing we saw an average temperature drop of between 20-30 degrees. This is demonstrated by one of many data sets during an event at Buttonwillow Raceway in Buttonwillow, CA. Testing Results:
Buttonwillow Raceway’s average temperature of the day was 72 F.
LEGEND:
Green= Acceptable temp. Orange= Borderline temp. Red= High Heat Without cooler:
Start temp 188 F
Lap 1)
208 F
Lap 2)
231 F Lap 3)
248 F Lap 4)
258 F
Lap 5)
264 F Lap 6)
267 F
With cooler on:
Start temp 188 F
Lap 1)
202 F
Lap 2)
218 F Lap 3)
227 F Lap 4)
232 F Lap 5)
235 F Lap 6)
238 F
Stillen has been hard at work prepping his R35 for race competition and in the process is developing new parts for the R35 GT-R. First on the agenda is the new urethane Front lip and sideskirts of which the front lip only weighs 4lbs. Next the anti-roll bars were made, braking enhancements with new AP rotors and fedaro pads, and the new exhaust.
Kyle had this to say…
The front lip is affordable and durable because its made of urethane.
GTR TRACK DAY ROUND 2 BUTTONWILLOW RACE 13CW! MARCH 30TH!I’ve locked down Buttonwillow Raceway RACE 13CW for March 30th, right after RedLine Time Attack weekend. We will be making a weekend out of it like last time, Watching Red Line on Sunday – Our very own NEO will be in Red Line with his GTR and Silvia! Then staying in Bakersfield and Ripping it up on Monday! The top cars on the West Coast scene will be in attendance! Craig Lieberman has confirmed to do a full video coverage of this event in HD. He is bringing all of his equipment and we will be recording various in car, on car, and trackside HD video. We also have pro photographers coming out to take shots all day. I will do HDR photos of your car near end of day as well (See Sample Pics Below). - 12 GTRs Max Private Track Day SPECIAL GUESTS + INVITED GUESTS: - Sasha Singleton (Import Model – See Pic Below) MORNING STUFF PLANNED: - Driver meeting 8am AFTERNOON PLANS, AFTER LUNCH, ALL DAY: - All 12 cars running on track at same time for video coverage and pictures! LATE AFTERNOON: - BIKINI CAR WASH STARING SASHA SINGLETON AND CANDACE PITMAN! WHOO! TRACK CLOSE AT 5PM: - GROUP DINNER DOWN THE FREEWAY A BIT! PARTY TIME!
[Source: Nagtroc] I cant read German and my wife is sleeping atm, so i have some scans to share of the AutoBild Magazine – sportscars at the Las Vegas Motor Speedway infield. Some facts are this track doesnt take advantages of many turns so the GT-R will be much slower to the rest. the same test on a differnt track will net faster results in the GT-R due to its advanced AWD and cornering abilities. The rest of the cars are far more expensive than the R35 GT-R. Since the GT-R can destory most of the other compeition it has to be pitted against the best of the best, hence why its put into cars in a differnt catigory, which shows how great it is for the price.
A short rundown of what it says… Corvette ZR1 vs. Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano vs. Nissan GT-R vs. Porsche GT2 engine: V8 compressor vs. V12 vs. V6 bi-turbo vs. flat-6 bi-turbo 0-100 km/h: 3.5 vs. 3.4 vs. 3.4 vs. 3.6 s 1/4 mile: 11.2 cs. 11.3 vs. 11.6 vs. 11.4 s Vmax: 323 vs. 324 vs. 314 vs. 322 km/h 0:56.86 – Corvette ZR1 final placement: 1st – Corvette ZR1, unbeatable at the price Now that the Passord:JDM Rear Elevated Spoiler is now in production we got pic’s to show it off and a link to purchase! This new design keeps the center brake light, and ups the ante with quality, strenght and light weight. The wing was also made in mind to increase performance over the stock design. keeping the base aero but imporving it by adjusting the layout approx 60mm higher and 50mm farther back than stock. pitch is increased ever so slightly for just enough extra downforce without too much added drag.
With Password:JDM your investing in inovation, dedication, and research, plus everything i have just mentioned about the product above. Lightweight is a key feature but making sure that the designs incorperated are exceeding the stock deisngs and keeping them lightweight while being inovative is key. Everyone who has seen these Password:JDM products have said they are simply amazing quality, rightfully so, they are created using propriatry techniques on the same line as there lambo parts. PWJDM are very involved with the communitys they support, and thats annother key advantage to the compainy. They have released these products based on the userbase of dedicated owners of the car, which shows a great dedication to these parts being made.
Annother key advantage is the price of PWJDM peices. They are exceptional in every regards, and that means price is usually going to be very high, but Password Industries is not skimping on anything including prices which are very very good for all there products in the GT-R lineup. These are made in dry carbon weighting only 4.4lbs made 100% in the USA, have a UV clear coat and a gloss finish. The price is only $2499.99 which is easily a steal.
[Source: Password:JDM] view more for more pictures!
Daryl at J-spec connect just went into development of a few body mods for his R35 GT-R. Check out the modified side skirts and the rear defuser (rear defuser is metal right now because its a mold for the carbon fiber peice that will result from it.
S [Source: J-spec Connect] Hyper Power International in Cali has been dyno testing stock cars verifing the manufactures claimed horse power ratings by factoring in actual drive train losses instead of guesses. They have many cars from many different manufactures which all have exact or very close numbers to the manufactures claimed specifications. Motortrend did an articlenot so long ago testing the R35 GT-R on the hyper power dyno and achieved a very close to claimed power of the car within about 5%. Then hyper power had a fundraiser for the schoolhis children goto, for school supplies since times are rough and had a few other stock R35 GT-R’s verify the claimed horse power. Most if not all have been rated at around the 480hp rating the R35 GT-R has been rated at.
Garage Tuners have been busy at work adding extra horse power to the R35, using various methods and no one can claim max crank horse power due to the nature of most dyno’s… they are a great tool for showing the increase in horse power from parts added (by doing before and after pulls). The only dyno that’s within a very good percentage close to actual real results is the Hyper Power International dyno, of course the results have a percentage of error, but past pulls on many different cars shows very consistent results very close if not exact to the claimed manufacture specs.
Hence where we are now, how much power these cars are actually putting out when modified? The question everyone has been asking. Sp Engineering have taken up an offer to have the car dynoed at Hyper Power Internationalto find out the actual horsepower of the GT570 kit + the Cobb accessport with various octain gas.
Lets see the first tests that SP engineering have done with Cobb tuning on SP engineering’s very own dyno. The graph shows the actual horse power uncorrected at the wheels. approx 560hp give or take.
Now the same car same octain and actual crank horse power with drivetrain loss factored in the car makes approx 623hp which equates to about 10% drivetrain loss as Nissan themselves specify. Looks like pretty reliable numbers to me! So far this is about the max power the HKS GT570 kit + Cobb accessport can put out. Meth injection and larger injectors will extract more power with the stock turbo’s but only so much before the stock turbos have to be upgraded.
Its been mentioned by Cobb tuning that the stock turbos are good for up to 21psi (1.45bar) of boost with upgraded injectors, but no further. The max the stock injectors can handle is said to be about 19psi (1.3bar). Right now testing is being done at SP engineering with upgraded injectors for even higher results.
South Side Performance, Power enterprise, AMS, and Switzer performance have all made charger upgrades to max out the stock fuel system and beyond (others will surely follow). SSP have shown 645 horsepower so far the max rated horse power (we hear it goes far higher!) from an upgraded turbo setup yet. Power enterprise are claiming 700PS with 670ps to the wheels with there 4 charger system (tho no dyno runs have been done yet). Switzer performance have stopped at 626whp for reliability, and usable track performance. AMS have yet to install there turbos for numbers but will be doing so in the next 3 or 4 weeks. The car’s potential is very high and with engine internal upgrades and transmission upgrades coming out in the next few short months the numbers are going to climb higher than these early results.
[Source: Hyper Power International and SP Engineering via NAGTROC] Megan Racing have created a Fully Adjustable Coilover kit for the R35 GT-R. The kit will retail at SPEED FOR SALE at the end of March. If you pre-order now they will be the Lowest price Coilover available at $999 Shipped. After the end of March the price goes back up to Regular retail price, which is also very good!
Speed For Sale will be the exclusive distributors and they will supply a writeup on installation and testing before and after versus stock coilovers at either Little Talladega or Road Atlanta in the near future. Stay tuned to Nissan GTR Club for those writeups.
[Source: Speed For Sale] SSP 1000RR Turbo UpgradeSouth Side Performance has delivered a larger upgrade turbo than that 820RR previously released. This system is capable flowing 1000hp.
* Please Note: The 1000hp rating is for the turbines only. Clearly massive upgrading to all of the GT-R’s components are needed to support the 1000hp capacity of these turbos. The turbines will bolt right up and run on a stock motor, providing more power than stock when compared at equal boost levels.
Currently as of February 2009 there are modifications and systems in place to reach 700hp territory. In upcoming months we will release upgrades for the transmission, more fuel upgrades, more custom tuning maps and other modifications that will increase the GT-Rs capability to maximize these turbos. In due time the supporting modifications will be released to utilize the full potential of these turbos.
Currently the specifications are secret.
[Source: GT-RR]
These new AMS turbo upgrades will be available asap and are direct bolt on replacements that can be capable of handling 800hp and above. Turn around is about one week. With oil and water fed Dual ball bearing Garret based turbo’s reliability wont be a problem.
AMS Performance will be testing these turbos in the next 3 to 4 weeks to get real world numbers and performance and reliablilty dialed in. AMS plans to start with just the upgraded turbos and a stock R35, then start bolting parts on to dial the car in. AMS have already got a full exhaust in development and should be out in a few weeks aswell.
Please email Eric at AMS performance for orders. Pictures will be available later. The latest Episode of Best Motoring is undergoing filming and was tested earlier this week on Tsukuba Circuit. Due to the previous nights rain, lower temps and the unfriendly wet handling tires (Dunlops) the spec-v posted lower times than all the other models before it.
More testing will show that the performance is better on this race track in better conditions. The spec-v has shown to be faster on Sendai Highland raceway as we posted a video eariler - Spec V Time Attack @ Sendai Highland Raceway. The Spec-v Achived a time of 1′57″14 and the standard 09 GT-R achived a time of 1′59″51.
The results at Tsukuba are pritty good for the conditions givin comming in at 1:02.4, HOWEVER the previous times for the 09 gt-r was 1:01.34 and the 08 at 1:01.89. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2010 GTRCenter - All Rights Reserved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||